[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543293
 ] 

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1103:
----------------------------------------------

The transformation of an HR attribute's value is done in 
org.apache.directory.server.core.schema.SchemaInterceptor.assertHumanReadable()

Then the value is stored as a String into the backend. Or at least, it's 
supposed to be stored as String. Any reason why we get a byte[] from the 
backend ???

> New human readable normalizers need to intelligently figure out how to handle 
> byte[]s (Review needed)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1103
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1103
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Alex Karasulu
>            Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny
>             Fix For: bigbang
>
>
> Looks like some of the new normalizers like this one do not know how to 
> handle byte[]s.  This is very bad and compare operations will all fail 
> because these normalizers must be passed a byte[] by the compare handling of 
> the server.  Note that CompareContext uses a byte[] for the value being 
> compared regardless of the human readibility of the attributeType's syntax.
> Example referred to above:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=595845
> Emmanuel can you take a look at this one for me or at least comment on it - I 
> figure you know best the normalizer you added a while back.  But however I 
> wanted to also ask if there is a better way to solve this than I did above.  
> I guess I can make the compare operation figure out what to give the 
> normalizer.  Anyways I think we're going to be in a great possition soon when 
> we do all this Value and ServerEntry stuff - these kinds of problems will 
> never happen again.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to