Alex Karasulu wrote:
http://www.networksasia.net/article.php?type=article&id_article=2536
<http://www.networksasia.net/article.php?type=article&id_article=2536>
Some more :
http://anil-identity.blogspot.com/2007/11/story-of-opends-and-departing-neil.html
What is interesting is the OpenDS mailing list, where Ludovic Poitou
explained that the reason for all this is that the governance has been
changed without Sun approval.
Back one year, when we met OpenDS peeps at Austin during the US Apache
Conference, we pointed out that Open DS governance was not really good
(ie, as the project leader _must_ be a Sun employee, that means it's not
an OSS, but a OSS managed by Sun). The modification changed this point
to something more open :
https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.html?r1=1622&r2=1739
It has been reverted last week :
https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.html?r1=1739&r2=3475
Sun will have some hard time to stop the flurry of comment about what
happened... Not especially a confortable position for them, nor for Neil
and the Austin ex-team ...
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
