Alex Karasulu schrieb: > Hey sorry I missed this one. +1 to doing this - its a great idea. > Perhaps even a section where we have: > > <version> > <major>1</major> > <minor>5</minor> > <micro>1</micro> > <snapshot/> > </version> > > verses ... > > <version>1.5.1-SNAPSHOT</version> > > This may be overkill though. WDYT?
Not having much knowledge about the server.xml file, but it's an xml file. So what about a namespace, e.g. xmlns:adsver="http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5.1/server"; ? Looking at the server.xml a bit closer it looks like a spring-bean definition file. If this configuration file is just 'thrown' in spring it probably makes more sense having a (factory-)bean returning just the version and then injecting the bean in other beans where ever this could be needful. > > My thought WRT this idea was to avoid having to parse the version from > 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT. > > Alex > > On Dec 27, 2007 11:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > > Up... > > > > Anyone? > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Pierre-Arnaud > > > > On Dec 17, 2007 7:28 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Dev, > > > > We were chatting with Stefan Seelmann some time ago about Apache > > Directory Studio and more particularly about the Apache DS > > Configuration plugins and we came to the conclusion that it could > > be a great thing if the server.xml file could be tagged (in some > > way) with the version number of the Apache DS Server it defines > > (e.g. 1.5.1, 1.5.2, etc.). > > > > It could help us know when we are parsing the file which kind of > > configuration ( 1.5.0 , 1.5.1, 1.5.2) we are dealing with. > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Regards, > > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot > > > > > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> > directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org> > > >
