Yeah the RC or M numbering is usually the schema because you never know when you're going to stop improving it. No big deal though. As long as you can distinguish between milestone/candidate pre-GA releases that's great.
Alex On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Actually it was supposed to be the 1.1.0-RC (without any number). I did > that on purpose, as I thought we would't do another RC for this version > (This topic will be discussed in another mail). > > But if the habit is to number any RC, then for the next version it will > RC1 instead of RC. ;) > > Regards, > Pierre-Arnaud > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It was supposed to be a 1.1.0-RC1. As the 1 is missing, let's assume > > that it was a RC0 :) > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I'm looking at the download page here and was wondering if the 0 or 1 > > in RC > > > was left off? > > > > > > http://directory.apache.org/studio/downloads.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alex > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com > > > >
