On Feb 25, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I did some small tests in order to check if storing DN into a BTree
was slower than using an Hash. Assuming that we have enough memory
to cache data, I found that using a Hash does not bring any kind of
performance boost compared to using a BTree. Worst, it slow down the
wriate operation (twice slower ...).
My small test was to store 500 000 DNs, using a 200 000 elements
cache, and searching for 500 000 random DNs from the created
structure.
Some more insights :
- if the cache is not big enough, performances are just incredibly
bad (disk accesses, a hell lot ...)
- JDBM might be a little bit too light to support more than a few
hundred of thousands elements.
Very interesting. Can you check in your stuff into a sandbox?
Regards,
Alan
