-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Pepijn

Some thoughts to discuss about sesame.

Creating/modifying
- -----------------------
- - When getting the keywords from sesame do we still need the search for keywords or is it possible to get only related keywords and show them all? I hope it's possible to generate a specific enough query that a search becomes obsolete. - - How do we store the chosen keywords in a workunit/subproject/... We don't have a unique key (at least I haven't found one). Does this mean that we need to store the rdf tuple we have selected?

Indexing
- ----------
- - We probably will need to index the whole tuple (e.g. keyword) to make able in the search if its narrower or brother.

Search
- ---------
- - Give the user the possibility to select specific tuples, indicate if explicit/broader/narrower search shall be done and then execute the search on our lucene index with the given arguments.

I suggest to start with the creating/modifying task. This will have the benefit that the stored keywords are consistent with a given ontology and can be searched via legacy search if the 'ontology-based' search is not (fully) implemented.


WDOT?

Felix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgHAC4ACgkQ2lZVCB08qHHSyQCdEHmRZwipV8Z+aqPEUC4czFvv
EvcAoN6lchk5YROFPLdlRgnxL1vQSDGc
=B90T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to