Hi,
we have a full list of XXXHandler and DefaultXXXHandler classes, the
former being an abstract class, the second is the implementation.
Usually we have this inheritence scheme :
public abstract class AbstractLdapHandler implements MessageHandler
public abstract class XXXHandler extends AbstractLdapHandler implements
MessageHandler
public class DefaultXXXHandler extends XXXHandler
Two questions :
1) why don't we simply merge the XXXHandlers and DefaultXXXHandlers ?
2) The XXXHandler could be declared this way :
public abstract class XXXHandler extends AbstractLdapHandler<XXXRequest>
instead of implementing the MessageHandler interface, which is already
implemented by the AbstractLdapHandler. We should also parametrize the
MessageHandler to MessageHandler<Request>
wdyt ?
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
