Hi Alex, Thanks for your answers. :)
Should I consider opening a Jira for the situation we have with the LDAPS enablement? I also noticed that there are 3 occurences for 'AllowAnonymousAccess': 1 in the 'defaultDirectoryService' bean (set to 'true'), 1 in the 'ldapServer' bean (set to 'false') and 1 in the 'apacheDS' bean (set to 'false'). Should I do the same thing? Consider it's set to 'true' when they're all at 'true'? Should I also open a Jira? Thanks, Pierre-Arnaud On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm updating the Studio's Apache DS Configuration plugin to be able to > > edit Apache DS 1.5.2 server.xml file and I'm a little lost since the XBean > > move. > > > > I have a few questions: > > > > • Back in 1.5.1 (and 1.5.0), we had an "environment" bean where we could > > set the admin DN and credentials, as well as a list of binary attributes. > > It's not in the 1.5.2 server.xml file... Where has it gone ? > > > > It's gone forever thankfully. We no longer need to include the Admin > principal DN and password in the server.xml file. > > > > > > • In the 1.5.2 server.xml file, we have this 'ldapServer' bean > > (id='ldapsServer') for the LDAPS configuration, in which we have two boolean > > attributes: 'enabled' and 'ldapsEnabled'. When should I consider that LDAPS > > is enabled? When both are set to true? > > > Ohh boy I hate that this is the case. It's just a mess in there with both > these parameters. You're right though about your conclusion. Both must be > true for the LDAPS capability to be enabled. > > > > > > > > • It seems that each declared protocol must be referenced in the > > 'apacheDS' bean. Am I right? > > If yes, then if I want to enable the DNS server inside Apache DS, I'll > > need to uncomment the 'dnsServer' bean, add an 'id' to it and reference it > > in the 'apacheDS' bean? > > > > Yep you're right. > > Thanks, > Alex > > >
