Sure ! PS : I don't know why, but this message was sent directly to me, with Directory ML CCed. Have you just 'replied' ?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you add a JIRA with the background knowledge you have on this so we can > schedule it for a later release? > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> I think it's just because some methdosz are throwing exception, so we >> have to catch them. This portion of the code is the last part of the >> SASL bidning, when the nego is completed, and we are cleaning >> everythong in the session (like the credentials) before starting. >> >> We may have to check which excpetion could be thrown, in order to >> react correctly. >> >> Sometime, a method throw an exception even when it's known that >> nothong wrong could happen, but you still have to catch the exception. >> This is certainly a sign that the design is weak... >> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > There's an ignored exception on line 492 of BindHandler (protocol-ldap >> > module) [0] that gets swallowed up without anything. I added a log >> > message >> > but I was just wondering if there was some intent to ignore this. >> > >> > Emm can you provide some feedback on this. Also there is some unused >> > code. >> > Don't know if this is temporary though but things like getSubject() and >> > getSaslRealms() is not used. >> > >> > Alex >> > >> > ------- >> > [0] - http://ahvieb.notlong.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Cordialement, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
