Hi guys,
The syntax for a Manisfest.mf file does not allow comments, so you can't
include a header. We already tied to inject such a header a few months
ago, but without success.
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi Felix,
The license header is mandatory on all source file ("Source File Headers for
Code Developed at the ASF") as it is mentionned in this page [1].
I don't think the manifest file can be considered as a source file.
Generally it's more a generated file, but in some cases (studio's case
mainly) we need to store them in SVN.
So I think (and it's only my personal POV), the license header is not useful
in this kind of files.
What do others think ?
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
[1] - http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I'm not sure, but do manifest.mf files really do need to have a license
header? If not we should exculde the manifest
files in the TLP pom from RAT.
Felix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjE75EACgkQ2lZVCB08qHGGxACgvYgsXfc6js9Te06k9+XfkJTo
BasAn0ipT1vew8xqHn0ItfYJgKZuQbgC
=qreI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
