Hi Felix,

Yeah, I think we should rename it.
Let's follow the Maven guidelines.

Thanks,
Pierre-Arnaud

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all
>
> Reading this [1] thread we (I) name the studio -plugin in the wrong way. It
> should be name studio-maven-plugin instead
> of maven-studio-plugin. Do we need / Should we rename the plugin to
> studio-maven-plugin?
>
> WDOT?
>
> Felix
>
> [1] http://www.nabble.com/How-to-name-my-own-plugin--to19699944.html
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkjge2IACgkQ2lZVCB08qHHK4QCgkemAxOo/y28zNDoy/4aQs5FN
> Sv4AoKn84/c6CMGKtAbIYsKmyJrY6YT0
> =Cv1g
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to