>> More to come later, but in the mean time, thanks for your insights ! > > Fyi, this is why OpenLDAP's documentation states that tight clock > synchronization (thru NTP or similar) is required for MMR. It makes sense, definitively.
You can have > atomic clocks or WWV radio clock receivers attached to all of your servers, > to achieve the same thing. Also, within the CSN, the numerical ServerID > field imposes an implicit prioritization of the servers... There is one thing I would like to improve in the CSN definition found in the draft, is that it's a second based timestamp. Using java 5, we can have a 10ms accuracy with the System.currentMilis() method. I'm afraid we can't get a better accuracy ... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
