hi Alex,
> Again like I said it's not this simple. I think JDBM API's start to fail > overall on corruption depending on how the corruption impacts accessing the > BTree. One bad access can cause access to half the entries to fail. > yeah, JDBM fails even if a single byte in the end changes (I just removed a character using vi editor then started the server, it barfed ;) ) > > I think you're idea would work very well if the journal was well integrated > with JDBM at the lowest level. don't think I understood the 'lowest level' completely and one more thing, I think this journal should be a replica of CL (CL is more robust with indices though) this way we can even recover a crashed CL wdyt? Kiran Ayyagari > > > Regards, > Alex > >
