So more info : when you do something like :
tag op0 tag op1 tag tag op2 only one tga is created. So when reverting twice (as I did, expecting to have an noop revert, and be back to op1), it move backward to op0, as if the stack was : tag op0 tag op1 tag op2 Shouldn't we 'name' the tags instead of using the operation number ? ie, having something like : tag-0 op0 tag-1 op1 tag-2 tag-3 op2 so that the first 'revert' reverts tag-3, and the second 'revert' reverts back to tag-2, leaving op1 available. wdyt ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
