Felix Knecht wrote:
Thanks Stefan
Stefan Zoerner schrieb:
Hi Felix!
Felix Knecht wrote:
- What is meant by 'another bean I didn't convert'?
extract from server.xml:
<!-- another bean I didn't convert -->
<spring:bean
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.CustomEditorConfigurer">
<spring:property name="customEditors">
<spring:map>
<spring:entry key="javax.naming.directory.Attributes">
<spring:bean
class="org.apache.directory.server.core.configuration.AttributesPropertyEditor"/>
</spring:entry>
</spring:map>
</spring:property>
</spring:bean>
In the old Spring configuration it was possible to inject the context
entry in LDIF format, this was done with the property editor feature.
It is not needed any more from my point of view, and can be removed.
So I suppose that the spring namespace isn't needed anymore in the
configuration file. So a configuration file will look like attached one.
It's building and passing integration tests (mvn cleaninstall
-Dintegration).
Can the apacheds gurus confirm that removing spring namespace and
CustomEditorConfigurer bean is ok? If so I'll commit the changed files
in the server-xml module of apacheds.
Should be ok. be carefull to modify the <file>.xml in the server-xml
project : they are samples used to check some aspects of the configuration.
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
