On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Stefan Zoerner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all! > > David Jencks wrote: > >> 1. in your list below there are at least 2 kinds of "type" info for the >> parameters: known types (int) and objects where the main choice is which >> class you use to implement an interface (Interceptor). I think these are >> sort of qualitatively different but that is not clear from your notation. >> As a sub-comment I don't know how you'd specify the implementation class >> for a component in DIT but this is probably my own ignorance. >> > > Perhaps a comparable point: Spring offers us extensibility (custom > partitions, custom interceptors etc) ans these extension may have an > arbitrary configuration. > > We must not loose that from my point of view. > Yes I agree. With that said we must and can make sure this capability is preserved with a switch to CiDIT. Alex
