Hi on the MINA part, I looked your patch, it need some work in both term of doco and extracting common parts between AprSocketXXX and AprDatagramXXX because most of the logic is the same. I plan to work on that next week on MINA TRUNK, so if it's integrated it's going to be in MINA 2.0.0-RC1.
Julien Le Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:57:21 +0200, Lorenz Breu <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi guys > > Sorry for the cross-post two 3 lists, but this whole jSLP issue > depends on work from all three areas... > > As mentioned in the ApacheDS devlist, jSLP will be ready for release > really soon. However, jSLP relies on: > > ----------------------------------------------- > MINA multicasting > > I implemented AprDatagram classes in order to be able to multicast > using MINA. These classes are currently being revised. I used the > classes myself and they seem to work, both when used by the > standalone jSLP directory agent as well as when used as OSGi bundles > (equinox). These classes however require: > > > ----------------------------------------------- > tomcat native > > There were a bunch of typo bugs in the release version of tomcat > native (have been fixed by now) when I started working on jSLP/MINA, > so I was forced to use my own fixed version of libtcnative and tomcat > native (aka tomcat-apr aka tomcat-jni) here. I inserted a fixed > version into my local maven repo to be able to build MINA and jSLP. I > also needed tomcat jni to run as a bundle, so I whipped up a quick > pom.xml to build me a tomcat-jni OSGi bundle including the (fixed) > libtcnative libraries for windows (doesn't work, multicast fails > without any errors), linux 32 bit and linux 64 bit (both worked, used > them myself). > > > > > > So my questions are the following: > - Is there a timeframe on the official release of the tomcat native > code to the maven central repo? > - Will there be an OSGi bundle version including the native code? > - Is there a timeframe on the official relase of the AprDatagram code, > even if in some kind of beta version? > - If the answer to any of the above is "yes", can I also get some info > on version etc. in order to adjust my POM.xml files for jSLP 2.0? > > > cheers, > lorenz >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
