Hi Emmanuel, Actually we're not using those sysouts to update the states of the server.
We're checking the ports to verify if a server is stopped/starting/started. So, it can be removed without issue. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Alex Karasulu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Martin Alderson > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Martin these are not Log messages but purely System.out.println() > method > >> > calls. > >> > > >> > Alex > >> > >> Looks like there's both: > >> > >> LOG.info( "Ldap service started." ); > >> System.out.println( "Ldap service started." ); > >> > >> I think it could be useful to have ServiceListeners anyway, but for this > >> case I would have thought the usual logging configuration would be > enough > >> (after the System.out.printlns have been removed). > >> > > > > Oh yes u are right. I was not even thinking about the log statements > which > > can be filtered via the log4j.configuration. > > No that's not enough. Those info are used by studio to update the > Server states. Using the logs is too complicated. If we don't want to > implement the listeners, then we should keep those System.out. > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
