[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702264#action_12702264
]
Jürgen Weber commented on DIRSTUDIO-486:
----------------------------------------
Hi Stefan,
RFC 2849 requires a version-spec (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2849.txt), so I
think it should always be included.
And it might puzzle users if print output is different to export output.
Contrary to what I wrote earlier, I am not sure if there should a checkbox at
all, as the RFC requires the version spec.
Or maybe there should be a checkbox for *not* having the version spec
[ ] Omit Version Specification
> Include Version Specifier in LDIF export
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSTUDIO-486
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-486
> Project: Directory Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Reporter: Jürgen Weber
> Assignee: Stefan Seelmann
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Studio does not include a Version Specifier ("version: 1") in the generated
> LDIF export
> (see http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/5997.html -> LDIF Content
> Records)
> E.g. the Novell LDAP classes for Java will not accept an LDIF that does not
> contain the Version Specifier.
> Perhaps Studio could make this optional, e.g. by a setting on the Text
> formats preferences page:
> [x] add Version Specifier
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
