On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote: > >> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while applying Kiran's patch for new system index, I found that we >>> should fix some inconsistency. We have what we name 'Existance' index, >>> which is the 'Presence' index. >>> >>> First, we should get rid of the 'existance' name, and replace it by >>> 'existence'. >>> >>> Second, we should keep only one of the 'existence' or 'presence'. Unless >>> I'm totally wrong, they are just the same. The question is which one >>> should we keep ? I would prefer keeping 'existence' rather than >>> presence, because it's more explicit. >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> >> >> "Presence" has established history in the protocol specs... >> > > > As I replied to this mail in my response to your mail about the EntryCSN > (I'm a bit confused ...) : > - let's remove the exist[ae]nce and replace it by 'presence' (and not > presance ;) > - let's keep using a BTree for all those guys (UUID and entryCSN). We will > have to find time to experiment how many micro-seconds we may spare by using > a HTree on UUID later ;) > None of this context makes sense to me here Emm. Alex > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > > -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
