On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote:
> Alex Karasulu wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> Alex Karasulu wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm running into several bugs and workaround because a byName hash was >>>> never >>>> implemented in the new SchemaObject. I guess this functionality had to >>>> be >>>> taken out of the OidRegistry and placed into specific type registries to >>>> avoid name collisions. However I thought there would be a byName hash. >>>> >>>> Any reason why this was explicitly not created ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> We don't need it. The byOid( String ) method (implemented in >>> SchemaRegistries) retrieves the OID when a name or an oid is provided. >>> You >>> can do : >>> >>> String oid = attributeTypeRegistry.byOid( "ou" ); >>> >>> or >>> >>> String oid = attributeTypeRegistry.byOid( "2.5.4.11" ); >>> >>> That should be enough for our need. >>> >>> >>> >> >> In theory yes but it did not work properly. >> > Then there are some bugs in the way we feed this unique data structure. > Let's fix them instead of creating a redundant one. > > OK cool. -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
