I don(t know if this is a requirement for Studio but switching to Java 6 may lead to problems when using Studio into specific Eclipse configurations (RAD, ...). which may be based on Java5.
Regards Jeff MAURY On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Ersin ER <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:20, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Ersin, >> >> Ersin ER wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The question is simple: are we considering Java 6 as the minimum required >>> JVM version for ApacheDS 2.0? >>> >> >> I think the same question is valid for Studio. >> >> especially interested in javax.scripting APIs for the SP subsystem (It >>> needs a serious review). Also some other related improvements have been >>> >> >> I think about a scripting console in Studio, in order to create scripts >> for mass updates as alternative to the batch operation wizard. >> > > Slightly off-topic: I also had a DirDsl initiative (in my mind :-) ), let's > keep in touch about that. > > >> So IMO for Studio 2.0 we should consider to switch to Java 6. >> > > So I support it as expected. > > But we need to hear any negative (or positive) experiences first. Features > are nice but without problems. > > >> Kind Regards, >> Stefan >> >> > > > -- > Ersin ER > http://www.ersiner.net > -- http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.lastfm.fr/listen/user/jeffmaury/personal
