On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/23/10 11:06 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> >> What do we want to implement ? Complete current operations or abandon all >>>>> >>>>> of >>>>> them? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why not both? Let's make this a configuration parameter on the >>>> BindHandler. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> yes, we can, optionally. >>> >>> In any case, we will have to set a gate keeper to forbid any new >>> operation >>> to enter the server as soon as a BindRequest is sent. I already have >>> implemented some, but it fails when doing a multi-step bind (SASL). >>> >> >> You just need to stop new operations on that socket not the whole server >> right? >> > > Absolutely. If any other resquest arrives, then I send back an > UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM response. >
Cool holio!
