[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12871306#action_12871306
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSHARED-12:
---------------------------------------
I can the the dependency, neither in shared/pom.xml nor in shared/asn1/pom.xml.
Is it already there?
Do we have a license problem here?
BouncyCastle License isn't part of the authorized third party licenses by
apache [1]. BouncyCastle says "our license is an adaptation of the MIT X11
License and should be read as such." [2]. To me (as a not native english
speaker) it's not very clean if "should be read as MIT X11 License" or "should
be read as adaption". At least for the 2nd interpretation I'm not sure if we're
allowed to use.
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
[2] http://www.bouncycastle.org/licence.html
> Remove the code taken from BouncyCastle since we now depend on bouncy castle.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSHARED-12
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-12
> Project: Directory Shared
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Alex Karasulu
> Fix For: 1.0.0-RC1
>
>
> We have a dep on bc now so there's no need for the forked classes in
> shared-asn1
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
