On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Stefan Zoerner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> I think that until we reach a point where we have a stable 2.0, we should >> go for 2.0.0-RC1. Then we can abandon this RC stuff. >> >> The reason is that we have a hell lot of things to do in order to be >> production ready for 2.0, including docs and tests (I mean, production >> tests). We are far from having all those guys finished... Also having a >> 2.0.0-RC1 will help us to send a message that ADS-2.0-RC1 is finally out >> there, ready to be tested, and we need feedback. If we release a 2.0 (no >> RC1) then we might have negative feedback like "it's crap, don't use it !", >> something we don't want to have for a final version. It *will* take time >> before we stabilize : remember 1.0-RCs ? >> > > > Exactly. The documentation lacks a lot of basic things. Many changes in the > development have not been applied to the confluence Wiki. > > The description on how to embed the server for instance or the way how to > use ApacheDS in unit tests have to be updated before officially releasing a > 2.0. > > A release candidate gives us a chance to consolidate that. > > But we have the same problem as always. Which confluence space to use? > Shall we reactivate DIRxSRVx20, and move things from 1.5 to there? > > +1 -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
