On Jun 4, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 6/4/10 2:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> Finally, what the heck is ERR_04007? :) I thought there already was a
>> discussion and community consensus about how there is little to negative
>> value in using numbers as error messages. Maybe I missed the conversation
>> where this opinion was reversed. If so, ignore this bit. :)
>>
> No, nobody missed this valid concern. We are just modifying them one by one
> when fixing issues using those error code :
>
> ERR_02014_UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION( "ERR_02014_UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION" ),
> ...
> ERR_04219_ARGUMENT1_NULL( "ERR_04219_ARGUMENT1_NULL" ),
> ERR_04220_ARGUMENT2_NULL( "ERR_04220_ARGUMENT2_NULL" ),
> ...
> ERR_04442_NULL_AT_NOT_ALLOWED( "ERR_04442_NULL_AT_NOT_ALLOWED" ),
> ...
> ERR_04457_NULL_ATTRIBUTE_ID( "ERR_04457_NULL_ATTRIBUTE_ID" ),
> ...
> ERR_04460_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_NULL_NOT_ALLOWED(
> "ERR_04460_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_NULL_NOT_ALLOWED" ),
> ...
> ERR_04477_NO_VALID_AT_FOR_THIS_ID( "ERR_04477_NO_VALID_AT_FOR_THIS_ID" ),
> ERR_04478_NO_VALUE_NOT_ALLOWED( "ERR_04478_NO_VALUE_NOT_ALLOWED" ),
> ERR_04479_INVALID_SYNTAX_VALUE( "ERR_04479_INVALID_SYNTAX_VALUE" ),
> ...
> ERR_09001_DIRECTORY_CREATION_FAILED( "ERR_09001_DIRECTORY_CREATION_FAILED"
> ),
> ...
> ERR_254_ADD_EXISTING_VALUE("ERR_254_ADD_EXISTING_VALUE"),
> ...
>
> ERR_272_MODIFY_LEAVES_NO_STRUCTURAL_OBJECT_CLASS("ERR_272_MODIFY_LEAVES_NO_STRUCTURAL_OBJECT_CLASS"),
> ...
> ERR_539_BAD_BLOCK_ID("ERR_539_BAD_BLOCK_ID"),
>
>
>
> We have something like one thousands of them, it will take time, but this
> approach works. Be patient :)
No worries. :) Why do they all have numbers in them?
Regards,
Alan
