Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 6/5/10 6:57 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Seelmann<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> two other small modules we have are core-constants and core-avl. >>> >>> I think we can move the 4 relevant files of core-contants to core-api >>> and delete core-constants.
What about core-constants? Is it ok to move the 4 interfaces to core-api? >>> >>> For core-avl I'm not sure if we should merge it into another module or >>> keep it as its own module. It is only used by the AVL store which is now >>> part of xdbm-partition, so the AVL classes could be moved there. Another >>> option is to move the AVL classes to core-api. >>> >> I would prefer to keep core-avl separate, just in case if somebody >> wants to reuse or want to work/tweak >> this code >> > I agree. avl-partition is one thing,core-avl is just a set of classes > implementig a data structure. It would be cool to have a commons-avl... Ok, let's keep core-avl.
