-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/16/10 17:58, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi Felix,
> 
> I'm not sure if the documentation should be in the 'apacheds' sub-project or 
> if it would be better to have it in a separate sub-project.
> It would probably allow us to work and release various versions of ApacheDS 
> and its documentation independently.

Ohh, ohhh ...

That's exactly what Emmanuel already mentioned [1]
I'll move it up (what shall the parent-pom be then?
- - directory/apacheds-parent
- - directory/project
- - ???

What it be ok to move it up at the level of apacheds/shared/... and add
it to the trunk-with-dependencies?

Thanks for heads up.

BTW
Do we need in this case a kind of pre-/post-processing to include
somehow the valid ApacheDS version for this guide?

Regards
Felix

[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-dev/201008.mbox/%[email protected]%3e

> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
> 
> On 16 août 2010, at 16:33, Felix Knecht wrote:
> 
> IMO it doesn't makes sense to build the user guides each time when the
> apacheds is built and/or tests are run.
> 
> So there're 2 possible solutions
> a) Add a profile containing the module 'user-guides' and them build it
> quite early in the build lifecycle [1], e.g. generate-sources
> b) Build it in a lifecycle after the common build lifecycle -> use one
> of the "Site lifecycles"
> 
> I'd preferre b), because this way one doesn't needs to remember that a
> profile has to be indicated for building the docs -> I'd leave it the
> way it is already "pre-site".
> 
> WDOT?
> 
> Regards
> Felix
> 
> [1]http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html#Lifecycle_Reference
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxpacsACgkQ2lZVCB08qHFnQQCgl8n+sGxkuJGjbcMR9T1o/et1
Y8oAn0uiutO30KnxamTV0ZMp2C1myBS3
=vDUK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to