On 8/18/10 2:13 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
I suggest we move back to this layout, if no one object.
wdyt ?
+1 on separate packages:
o.a.d.s.l.message for interfaces sounds right at top level then maybe
a o.a.d.s.l.message.implementation or perhaps o.a.d.s.l.message.default ?
But message interfaces should be at the higher level package with the
implementors below.
Hmmmm. I would *love* to do that, sadly, there is a constraint : as many
of the technical fields and methods used during the encoding are now
methods without a qualifier (ie, they are not public, protected or
private, they are package protected), if I move the classes away, I will
have to expose those methods again, or cast the object everytime I want
to access to those methods all over the code :/
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
