On 10/12/10 8:36 AM, Pierre-Arnaud MARCELOT wrote:
Hi,

I agree that it could be interesting to have this kind of feature.

Wouldn't it be more interesting to have the ability to give a list of specific 
ATs that should be hidden instead.
We have that in Studio and it gives much more power and flexibility.
That's a pretty good idea.

However, I think that this kind of protection can be better handled by the ACI subsystem. Atm, as it's a bit broken, I'd like to keep this parameter along until we have a better way to manage ATs.

That also means the move was not stupid, it's just that it's temporarily useful, and probably easier to manage than a global ACI.

--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to