On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi dev, > > our current partition implementations use different fields/methods to > configure the location where partition data is persisted: > - BTreePartition defines a 'partitionDir' with getter/setter, this is > used by the JdbmPartition > - AbstractLdifPartition defines a 'workingDirectory' with > getter/setter, this is used by LdifPartition > - SingleFileLdifPartition defines a 'ldifFile' which is set by the > constructor > > I'd like to propose to remove the existing fields and to add a new > 'partitionLocation' (or partitionPath? better names welcomed) field > including getter/setter instead: > - for JdbmPartition and LdifPartition this points to a directory in file > system > - for SingleFileLdifPartition this points to the single LDIF file in file > system > > Thoughts? > +1 I thought about making the partitionPath a URL but just saw your email. Consistency is good but why is using a URL so complex? Regards, -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
