+1 too On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Kind Regards, > Stefan > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[email protected]> > wrote: >> +1 >> >> We can probably add it later when needed. >> >> Regards, >> Pierre-Arnaud >> >> On 16 déc. 2010, at 19:38, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> currently we are supporting the following roles : >>> - AccessControl >>> - CollectiveAttributes >>> - TriggerExecution >>> - SubSchema >>> >>> The last one is just present, but we don't do anything with it. The >>> rational for such a role is to define 'namespaces' (kindof), ie some DIT >>> areas with a dedicated schema. This would be interesting as we might use >>> more than one schema in a single server. >>> >>> The problem is that the server does not support more than one server. >>> >>> I would suggest we don't manage SubSchema in the next version, as I'm >>> pretty sure no one out there will need such a feature any time soon. >>> >>> Wdyt ? >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Cordialement, >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>> www.iktek.com >>> >> >> >
-- Kiran Ayyagari
