Re: Changes to have a consistent naming in controls

[Emmanuel Lecharny]

On 2/2/11 3:21 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
+1
However, I'm not sure we need to change BasicControl to an interface.
It would just be an empty interface extending the Control interface. Not that 
useful to me.
I would rather stay with the existing class, as is.
Yeah, right. Maybe the interface for BasicControlImpl should simply be 
Control...


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com