On 2/15/11 11:12 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
The other constructors are most certainly spurious at this point :
Dn(Rdn child, Dn parent)
can be replaced by :
parent.add( child );
as the Dn is an immutable class.
Is it ok for all of you ?
I find it a bit inconvenient. If I see that a class has an "add()"
method I expect that when using that method that the object is
modified. I think I'd prefer to get rid of all the "add", "addAll" and
"remove" methods that pretend mutability.
Thinking about it more, and after having discussed it with
Pierre-Arnaud, I think you are right. The 'add' method are most
certainly worthless.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
