Hi Alex, Very good idea. I like this reorganization a lot.
At some point with our number of projects increasing, it really makes sense to group them in some kind of logical organization. We did the same thing for Studio a few months ago. +1 Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On lundi 28 février 2011 at 04:50, Alex Karasulu wrote: > Hi all, > > Shared has grown somewhat and I think it will grow more as we tack on > more protocol additions and functionality. I was thinking of using > some project module hierarchy to try to establish some organization we > can grow with. > > Here's what I was thinking: > > shared/ > i18n/ > util/ > integ/ > asn1/ > api/ > ber/ > dsml/ > parser/ > engine/ > ldap/ > codec/ > model/ > schema/ > schema-converter/ > client-api/ > codec-standalone/ > all/ > protocol/ > mina/ > extras/ > aci/ > sp/ > trigger/ > util/ > archetype/ > control/ > extended/ > schema/ > codec/ > api/ > plugin/ > > The deepest level is 5 and we'd concat levels into the names as we > kind of do already. Here is the very last node, > shared-ldap-extras-codec-plugin, as an example of the artifactId > composition standard. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Alex >
