Hi Emmanuel, Makes totally sense to me.
It seems more obvious than EntryAttribute. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 30 mars 2011, at 16:21, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > when I initially started to write the EntryAttribute class, I picked this > name to avoid a confusion with the JNDI Attribute class. bck 2 years ago, it > was important, because we had a hell lot of JNDI code all over the shared and > server code. Mixing both name would have been a nightmare, with package > expended into the source instead of just having the imports. > > Now that we have been able to get rid of most of the JNDI calls, it might be > a good idea to move the name to use Attribute. > > wdyt ? > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
