On 11 avr. 2011, at 14:30, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > Hi Pierre-Arnaud, > > yeah, back then I was only searching for a method with name > *has*Attribute(), so thought it didn't exist. > Later Emmanuel told me about the *contains*Attribute(),
Oh, ok. Héhé. :) > P.S:- I would prefer both methods to start with either 'contains' > or 'has' , just to avoid confusion, but no big deal. That thing kind of confused me too. I agree with you completely. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Kiran, >> I think we already have equivalent methods for this. >> It's just not called 'hasAttributeType' but 'contains( [multiple arguments] >> )' and 'containsAttribute( AttributeType attributeType )'. >> Is it was you were looking for? >> Regards, >> Pierre-Arnaud >> >> On 6 avr. 2011, at 20:50, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: >> >> sorry accidentlly pressed send button, so am thinking that it would be good >> to have hasAttributetype() similar to hasObjectclass() >> >> On 07-Apr-2011 12:14 AM, "Kiran Ayyagari" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 to delete, l don't think they are widely used. OTOH i think we should >> have another method to check the presence of attributetyp >> >>> >>> On 06-Apr-2011 10:57 PM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> as I... >> >> > > > > -- > Kiran Ayyagari
