Currently, we can inject a messageId in the Message constructors :

    public AbandonRequestImpl( final int id )

I don't think it's a good idea, as we usually generate those id automatically (it's an incremental number).

I suggest we don't inject the ID through the setMessageId( int ) if needed, as usually we don't need to do that.

Note that it's the same thing for all the requests.

thoughts ?

--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to