On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <[email protected]>wrote:
> can we use a set of package names as input rather than individual > class names. I know it is a bit more work, but makes is a lot easier > to > configure and less input statements. > > +1 > not very urgent to have it now, we can change the way controls are > detected later, just wanted to know if there are any known limitations > that prevent > using package names. > > Don't think there should be issues with this. Basically we can search the package to see if there are classes implementing the required interfaces. Regards, -Alex
