This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that. I just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the technical challenges are fully clear to me.
Thanks, Alex On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[email protected]>wrote: > Sounds very good to me. > > Clear path for us and our users willing to evaluate the future of ApacheDS. > > +1 > > Regards, > Pierre-Arnaud > > On 30 mai 2011, at 15:43, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > as it was discussed last week, we think it's now time to cut a release > for ADS. The fact is that it will just be an intermediate release, not one > we can tell our users to depend on, but for us, it's important to have a > working base. > > > > I have started to reshuffle the issues, and created 2 more versions : > > 2.0.0-M1 : for configuration in DIT > > 2.0.0-M2 : for replication > > 2.0.0-M3 : for administrative model > > > > IMO, it's important to assin one major feature to each milestone, but > that does not mean we will not fix other issues nor we won't add some new > features, it's just convenient. > > > > Currently, we have started a bug parade, and try to fix as many as we > can, but I think we should start to cut the release this week. > > > > Any thoughts about this plan ? > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com > > > >
