On 10 juin 2011, at 10:37, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> we already discussed this topic two weeks ago, but now, I think we should >> really move on. >> >> Yesterday, I did a bug parade and started to fix issues. We have now 197 of > cool >> 301 issues fixed, which is a HUGE number of fixed issues. Add to that the >> fact we released LDAP-API 1.0.0-M4 last week, and that we have some serious >> features to add in the near future (administrative model, server >> OSGification, Replication), I'm keen to get the M1 milestone out asap. >> >> Note that I'm not pushing this release because we need it, but just because >> we need a stabilized base to work on. It worked wonderfully on the LDAP-API >> code base, with 4 releaes those past 5 months, and this is really a good >> feeling to see the progression every month when you do small steps instead >> of waiting for a giant leap. >> > indeed, these iterations worked well and it makes a lot of sense to continue > it >> I'll try to get as much issues fixed as possible in the next 3 days, and may >> be we can start considering a release at the beginning of next week? >> >> thoughts ? > > +1, thanks Emmanuel
This sounds also good to me. This pattern worked great on the API and, from my POV, it's important that developers/users can download (if they are interested in) intermediate "unstable" releases before the "official" 2.0 version is released. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud
