On 6/15/11 2:45 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
-1
Please revert these changes. Sufficient consideration has not been
given to these matters which have been around for years. We need more
time to discuss these matters.
This check is just not good enough, even if we want to detect cycles
when adding aliases : it does not check anything but a cycle from an
alias and a direct ascendant.
I removed it because of its deficiencies, not because I wanted to remove
the check. If we decide to implement a check when creating an alias, we
will add a correct detection mechanism, trust me on that.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
