On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Alex Karasulu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hiya, > > Going totally off memory here from years back. The search engine was > designed to expand the scope that aliases introduce with their references. > Meaning the scope expands to new areas if the reference points outside of > the base of the search: of course this is more complex when considering > deref modes and where the alias is. > > But essentially I was under the impression that dereferencing was not > handled in higher levels outside of the xdbm search in the partition. Hence > not in the filters injected into the returned cursor system. Are u > witnessing the contrary conditions? > No, you are right. The current system is leveraging (or at least is supposed to) the alias indexes. But it does not work correctly. I think it would be easier to handle aliases by sending new search requests in the upper cursor, AFAICT atm. I'm still analysing the current implementation, so I'm not 100% sure. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
