On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/29/11 11:52 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: >> >> everything is correct except that we don't add any entries for RootDSE >> i.e tuples with 0L >> e.x if we search on RootDSE with sublevel scope *all* entries are >> implicitly qualified as children >> making subLevel index unnecessary for lookup > > Ahhh, stupid me, of course ! > > So at the end, the SubLevel index should be : > > <1L, 1L> > <1L, 2L> > <1L, 3L> > <1L, 4L> > <2L, 2L> > <2L, 3L> > <2L, 4L> > <3L, 3L> > <3L, 4L> > <4L, 4L> > > right ? > yup > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >
-- Kiran Ayyagari
