On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/24/11 10:43 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I was just wondering if we should not add the HBase partition in trunks, >>> now >>> that the partition code has been cleaned up ? >>> >>> What's is the status for this code ? >> >> The last time I updated the code was back in November 2010. In the >> meantime the ApacheDS and HBase code changed so there is some work to >> do. HBase is now at version 0.90.3 (0.90.4 is in the pipeline), the >> API is stable and available in maven central which is a good thing. I >> can try to update the code next week, then I can give a better status >> report. > > AFAIR, you told me that the Aliaes indexes weren't added into the HBase > partition, right ?
Hm, the alias indexes are there and stored in tables, just like in JDBM. What I didn't add are one-level and sub-level index tables. For those indexes the information stored in the master table and tree/RDN table is used. Kind Regards, Stefan
