On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Last, not least, we need to improve the kerberos documentation. Many users > complain about it. The truth is that we fixed some blocking issues those > last weeks, bugs that were killing our implementation as a valid candidate > for a production kerberos server. But bugs are bugs, we can fix them. OTOH, > with a pathetic documentation, we can't expect to have users testing the > kerberos server, and giving us some feedback about problems they found in > the code. Sadly, we need some workforce to deal with this problem...
I totally agree with that point. I played with Kerberos the last weeks so I see it as my duty to contribute some documentation. But I'm unsure what documentation system we should use. Felix did a great job and moved all confluence pages to Docbook. But I know that at least you (sorry, I won't blame you ;-) don't like Docbook XML. So should we switch back to confluence? Kind Regards, Stefan
