Hi, it seems that AVL cursors are not protected against concurrent updates. Is this true or am I missing something?
The issue seems to be similar to the JDBM synchronization issues and is a blocker for the txn work. We either have to do something similar to jdbm or use a read write lock to provide synchronization. Read lock in this case would need to be held by a cursor as long as it is open. regards, Selcuk.
