branch is now in working state and tests are passing. You can uncomment passwordpolicy test too as it should pass as well. I will get back to working on this later.
thanks Selcuk On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Selcuk, > > before doing anything, *do* a backup of you changes. Save them somwhere > (even if it's merged with the svn up you've did). > > > Le 2/27/12 8:31 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit : > >> How do I revert a file while preserving my local changes? Is that >> possible with svn once I do an svn up? I could you could revert the >> latest commit and doing an svn up on my side would resolve the issue. >> >> thanks >> Selcuk >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Le 2/27/12 7:57 PM, Selcuk AYA a écrit : >>> >>>> thanks Emmanuel. I put my fixes on top of your changes which were >>>> there last week(when I started working on the code again). Only >>>> reverting to that point is good enough. Once I can verify the tests >>>> and check in the code, I will give a status update. >>> >>> Oh, ok. So then you can simply revert up to the version you find useful. >>> Don't be afraid to 'delete' whatever I did, in any case, if for any >>> (stupid) >>> rrason I need to get it back, subversion will have keep it. >>> >>> Many thanks ! >>> >>> FYI, I have debugged a bit more and found that the added entry with the >>> 'person' OC has somehow mess up the UUID index, so now, all the entries >>> are >>> linked to the<person,<added entry UUID>> pair. >>> >>> I have some trace if you need, but I guess you already fixed it. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Cordialement, >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>> www.iktek.com >>> > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
