> Let's vote now: > [X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M8 > [ ] ±0 | Abstain > [ ] -1 | Do NOT release Apache Directory Server 2.0.0-M8
RAT report looks good. Checksums and signatures are valid. Successfully built source distribution. I think legal files need some work. Here are some things I noticed, but I'm not sure if that are really issues: - NOTICE and LICENSE file in source and binary distributions look different. - There is no attribution/license for ehcache, jetty, and servlet-api in the binary distributions but at least the ueber jar contains such classes. - The binary NOTICE file lists OpenSymphony Quartz and IBatis but I don't see that such software is included - The binary LICENSE file lists JUG, OpenSymphony Quartz, and Spring but I don't see that such software is included Kind Regards, Stefan
