Le 2/17/13 2:53 AM, Howard Chu a écrit : > Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> >> I the long term, I would favor Mavibot for a couple of reasons : >> - first, it's a MVCC base, so we can conduct concurrent searches and >> modifications (although we can't do many modifications at the same >> time). >> - second, we have a complete understanding of the code : we wrote it. >> It's easier to understand the impact of the modifications we hve done >> on it. >> - third, we can have a dedicated backend based on the current Mavibot >> code, where all the data are in memory (that would work with a few tens >> of thousands entries, and the performances will be blazing fast). >> >> I'd like to know what's your opinion. > > Is it a requirement to stick to pure java? We recently had someone > inquire about a java wrapper for our Lightning DB library. Developing > that could get you a big boost without as much development effort, > assuming JNI is practical for deployments. The pb with JNI is that deploying an application becomes a PITA, and I'm not talking about embedding the server into a web application :/
-- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
